patchstar motorized micro-manipulator Search Results


86
Scientifica precise motorized xyz micromanipulator
Precise Motorized Xyz Micromanipulator, supplied by Scientifica, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/pmc12945486-148-12-16?v=Scientifica
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
precise motorized xyz micromanipulator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Scientifica micromanipulator
Micromanipulator, supplied by Scientifica, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/pmc12643469-416-4-7?v=Scientifica
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
micromanipulator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sutter Instrument motorized micromanipulator
Motorized Micromanipulator, supplied by Sutter Instrument, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/pmc11407768-265-7-9?v=Sutter+Instrument
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
motorized micromanipulator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cambridge NeuroTech electrode array neurotech h3
Electrode Array Neurotech H3, supplied by Cambridge NeuroTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/bio_rxiv__2020__06__16__126631-401-3-5?v=Cambridge+NeuroTech
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electrode array neurotech h3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss recording apparatus axioexaminer
Recording Apparatus Axioexaminer, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/pm31519892-250-9-12?v=Carl+Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recording apparatus axioexaminer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Scientifica upright microscope
Upright Microscope, supplied by Scientifica, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/pmc12825313-96-7-9?v=Scientifica
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
upright microscope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Nikon compound microscope
(A) Schematic of the custom built experimental setup. A head restrained 7dpf zebrafish larva is placed in a closed-loop optomotor track underneath a two-photon <t>microscope.</t> L1-6: convex lenses, F1-3 optical filters (See Methods). (B) A cartoon of the experimental protocol. Each trial is 2s long followed by a 5s inter-trial interval. 10% of trials chosen pseudorandomly are probe trials in which optic flow is not turned on. Latency to respond to optic flow in each trial is measured as the behavioral readout. (C) Average image of a single optical plane of Purkinje cells specifically expressing GCaMP6s under the aldoca promoter. Scale bar: 20µm. (D) A video grab from the closed-loop camera showing the tail of a head restrained fish while two-photon imaging was being carried out. (E) Example calcium imaging traces (blue) from 5 cells (ROIs marked in (C)) aligned to motor output (black trace) and the optic flow stimulus (green trace). (F) Representative behavioral response during a 100-trial experiment (top) and a zoomed-in section showing swim bouts around a single probe trial (bottom). (G) Most swim bouts occur during optic flow presentation. Almost no swim bouts occur during probe trials or in the interval between trials. p = 1.01 x 10 -13 by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, 27 fish. **p = 0.001 by Tukey’s post hoc test. (H) Average latency distribution for 27 fish (1.15 ± 0.29, mean ± SD).
Compound Microscope, supplied by Nikon, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/bio_rxiv__2021__04__28__441782-334-13-16?v=Nikon
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
compound microscope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Scientifica movable top plate
(A) Schematic of the custom built experimental setup. A head restrained 7dpf zebrafish larva is placed in a closed-loop optomotor track underneath a two-photon <t>microscope.</t> L1-6: convex lenses, F1-3 optical filters (See Methods). (B) A cartoon of the experimental protocol. Each trial is 2s long followed by a 5s inter-trial interval. 10% of trials chosen pseudorandomly are probe trials in which optic flow is not turned on. Latency to respond to optic flow in each trial is measured as the behavioral readout. (C) Average image of a single optical plane of Purkinje cells specifically expressing GCaMP6s under the aldoca promoter. Scale bar: 20µm. (D) A video grab from the closed-loop camera showing the tail of a head restrained fish while two-photon imaging was being carried out. (E) Example calcium imaging traces (blue) from 5 cells (ROIs marked in (C)) aligned to motor output (black trace) and the optic flow stimulus (green trace). (F) Representative behavioral response during a 100-trial experiment (top) and a zoomed-in section showing swim bouts around a single probe trial (bottom). (G) Most swim bouts occur during optic flow presentation. Almost no swim bouts occur during probe trials or in the interval between trials. p = 1.01 x 10 -13 by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, 27 fish. **p = 0.001 by Tukey’s post hoc test. (H) Average latency distribution for 27 fish (1.15 ± 0.29, mean ± SD).
Movable Top Plate, supplied by Scientifica, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/pm41521173-295-14-17?v=Scientifica
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
movable top plate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
QImaging camera retiga r1
(A) Schematic of the custom built experimental setup. A head restrained 7dpf zebrafish larva is placed in a closed-loop optomotor track underneath a two-photon <t>microscope.</t> L1-6: convex lenses, F1-3 optical filters (See Methods). (B) A cartoon of the experimental protocol. Each trial is 2s long followed by a 5s inter-trial interval. 10% of trials chosen pseudorandomly are probe trials in which optic flow is not turned on. Latency to respond to optic flow in each trial is measured as the behavioral readout. (C) Average image of a single optical plane of Purkinje cells specifically expressing GCaMP6s under the aldoca promoter. Scale bar: 20µm. (D) A video grab from the closed-loop camera showing the tail of a head restrained fish while two-photon imaging was being carried out. (E) Example calcium imaging traces (blue) from 5 cells (ROIs marked in (C)) aligned to motor output (black trace) and the optic flow stimulus (green trace). (F) Representative behavioral response during a 100-trial experiment (top) and a zoomed-in section showing swim bouts around a single probe trial (bottom). (G) Most swim bouts occur during optic flow presentation. Almost no swim bouts occur during probe trials or in the interval between trials. p = 1.01 x 10 -13 by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, 27 fish. **p = 0.001 by Tukey’s post hoc test. (H) Average latency distribution for 27 fish (1.15 ± 0.29, mean ± SD).
Camera Retiga R1, supplied by QImaging, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/pmc08140111-127-29-32?v=QImaging
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
camera retiga r1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ALA Scientific Instruments 4 tube or 8 tube ala perfusion manifold
(A) Schematic of the custom built experimental setup. A head restrained 7dpf zebrafish larva is placed in a closed-loop optomotor track underneath a two-photon <t>microscope.</t> L1-6: convex lenses, F1-3 optical filters (See Methods). (B) A cartoon of the experimental protocol. Each trial is 2s long followed by a 5s inter-trial interval. 10% of trials chosen pseudorandomly are probe trials in which optic flow is not turned on. Latency to respond to optic flow in each trial is measured as the behavioral readout. (C) Average image of a single optical plane of Purkinje cells specifically expressing GCaMP6s under the aldoca promoter. Scale bar: 20µm. (D) A video grab from the closed-loop camera showing the tail of a head restrained fish while two-photon imaging was being carried out. (E) Example calcium imaging traces (blue) from 5 cells (ROIs marked in (C)) aligned to motor output (black trace) and the optic flow stimulus (green trace). (F) Representative behavioral response during a 100-trial experiment (top) and a zoomed-in section showing swim bouts around a single probe trial (bottom). (G) Most swim bouts occur during optic flow presentation. Almost no swim bouts occur during probe trials or in the interval between trials. p = 1.01 x 10 -13 by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, 27 fish. **p = 0.001 by Tukey’s post hoc test. (H) Average latency distribution for 27 fish (1.15 ± 0.29, mean ± SD).
4 Tube Or 8 Tube Ala Perfusion Manifold, supplied by ALA Scientific Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/pmc06342252-38-19-23?v=ALA+Scientific+Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
4 tube or 8 tube ala perfusion manifold - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss inverted microscope
(A) Schematic of the custom built experimental setup. A head restrained 7dpf zebrafish larva is placed in a closed-loop optomotor track underneath a two-photon <t>microscope.</t> L1-6: convex lenses, F1-3 optical filters (See Methods). (B) A cartoon of the experimental protocol. Each trial is 2s long followed by a 5s inter-trial interval. 10% of trials chosen pseudorandomly are probe trials in which optic flow is not turned on. Latency to respond to optic flow in each trial is measured as the behavioral readout. (C) Average image of a single optical plane of Purkinje cells specifically expressing GCaMP6s under the aldoca promoter. Scale bar: 20µm. (D) A video grab from the closed-loop camera showing the tail of a head restrained fish while two-photon imaging was being carried out. (E) Example calcium imaging traces (blue) from 5 cells (ROIs marked in (C)) aligned to motor output (black trace) and the optic flow stimulus (green trace). (F) Representative behavioral response during a 100-trial experiment (top) and a zoomed-in section showing swim bouts around a single probe trial (bottom). (G) Most swim bouts occur during optic flow presentation. Almost no swim bouts occur during probe trials or in the interval between trials. p = 1.01 x 10 -13 by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, 27 fish. **p = 0.001 by Tukey’s post hoc test. (H) Average latency distribution for 27 fish (1.15 ± 0.29, mean ± SD).
Inverted Microscope, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/pmc06342252-38-83-86?v=Carl+Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
inverted microscope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ALA Scientific Instruments octaflow perfusion system
(A) Schematic of the custom built experimental setup. A head restrained 7dpf zebrafish larva is placed in a closed-loop optomotor track underneath a two-photon <t>microscope.</t> L1-6: convex lenses, F1-3 optical filters (See Methods). (B) A cartoon of the experimental protocol. Each trial is 2s long followed by a 5s inter-trial interval. 10% of trials chosen pseudorandomly are probe trials in which optic flow is not turned on. Latency to respond to optic flow in each trial is measured as the behavioral readout. (C) Average image of a single optical plane of Purkinje cells specifically expressing GCaMP6s under the aldoca promoter. Scale bar: 20µm. (D) A video grab from the closed-loop camera showing the tail of a head restrained fish while two-photon imaging was being carried out. (E) Example calcium imaging traces (blue) from 5 cells (ROIs marked in (C)) aligned to motor output (black trace) and the optic flow stimulus (green trace). (F) Representative behavioral response during a 100-trial experiment (top) and a zoomed-in section showing swim bouts around a single probe trial (bottom). (G) Most swim bouts occur during optic flow presentation. Almost no swim bouts occur during probe trials or in the interval between trials. p = 1.01 x 10 -13 by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, 27 fish. **p = 0.001 by Tukey’s post hoc test. (H) Average latency distribution for 27 fish (1.15 ± 0.29, mean ± SD).
Octaflow Perfusion System, supplied by ALA Scientific Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/patchstar+motorized+micro-manipulator/pmc06342252-38-27-30?v=ALA+Scientific+Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
octaflow perfusion system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Schematic of the custom built experimental setup. A head restrained 7dpf zebrafish larva is placed in a closed-loop optomotor track underneath a two-photon microscope. L1-6: convex lenses, F1-3 optical filters (See Methods). (B) A cartoon of the experimental protocol. Each trial is 2s long followed by a 5s inter-trial interval. 10% of trials chosen pseudorandomly are probe trials in which optic flow is not turned on. Latency to respond to optic flow in each trial is measured as the behavioral readout. (C) Average image of a single optical plane of Purkinje cells specifically expressing GCaMP6s under the aldoca promoter. Scale bar: 20µm. (D) A video grab from the closed-loop camera showing the tail of a head restrained fish while two-photon imaging was being carried out. (E) Example calcium imaging traces (blue) from 5 cells (ROIs marked in (C)) aligned to motor output (black trace) and the optic flow stimulus (green trace). (F) Representative behavioral response during a 100-trial experiment (top) and a zoomed-in section showing swim bouts around a single probe trial (bottom). (G) Most swim bouts occur during optic flow presentation. Almost no swim bouts occur during probe trials or in the interval between trials. p = 1.01 x 10 -13 by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, 27 fish. **p = 0.001 by Tukey’s post hoc test. (H) Average latency distribution for 27 fish (1.15 ± 0.29, mean ± SD).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Rapid acquisition of internal models of timing by Purkinje cells enables faster behavioral responses

doi: 10.1101/2021.04.28.441782

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic of the custom built experimental setup. A head restrained 7dpf zebrafish larva is placed in a closed-loop optomotor track underneath a two-photon microscope. L1-6: convex lenses, F1-3 optical filters (See Methods). (B) A cartoon of the experimental protocol. Each trial is 2s long followed by a 5s inter-trial interval. 10% of trials chosen pseudorandomly are probe trials in which optic flow is not turned on. Latency to respond to optic flow in each trial is measured as the behavioral readout. (C) Average image of a single optical plane of Purkinje cells specifically expressing GCaMP6s under the aldoca promoter. Scale bar: 20µm. (D) A video grab from the closed-loop camera showing the tail of a head restrained fish while two-photon imaging was being carried out. (E) Example calcium imaging traces (blue) from 5 cells (ROIs marked in (C)) aligned to motor output (black trace) and the optic flow stimulus (green trace). (F) Representative behavioral response during a 100-trial experiment (top) and a zoomed-in section showing swim bouts around a single probe trial (bottom). (G) Most swim bouts occur during optic flow presentation. Almost no swim bouts occur during probe trials or in the interval between trials. p = 1.01 x 10 -13 by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, 27 fish. **p = 0.001 by Tukey’s post hoc test. (H) Average latency distribution for 27 fish (1.15 ± 0.29, mean ± SD).

Article Snippet: The pipettes were guided visually using the 60x/1.0NA water immersion objective of a compound microscope (Ni-E, Nikon) and a motorized micromanipulator (PatchStar, Scientifica).

Techniques: Microscopy, Expressing, Imaging